Could the Atrocities in Rwanda have been Prevented or Minimized?

If more nations could score been more proactive, the atrocities could mystify been easily minimized. The UN helped to suffice peace between the warring parties, but did not make its peacekeepers to fire. Crack host from other nations evacuated their fellow citizens, but desuffraged the Rwandans. These argon evidences of inaction. I confide that the U.N had to be more decisive to fit the genocide. Either they intervene aggressively or they do not. If they had bow that they were not willing to help, a false sense of security measures system would not realize been created among the Rwandans. Rwandans thought that the U.N would protect them from the reserves and and then were not well prepared to retaliate. The U.N could have pack the Rwandan genocidal piano tuner to prevent people from spreading hate. The U.N could have responded to the many tip-offs that they received. The U.N could have authorized the troops to kill to save. The U.N could have entrust diplomatic press on Rwanda; they could have put economic pressure on Rwanda. However, they chose to keep discussing and failed to take action. In my opinion the U.N is where exclusively nations go to cover for inaction. On the other hand, the U.N may have its avow causalitys for its inaction. The shelter Council could either beef up or remove its military presence in Rwanda.

They stubborn to withdraw after most of its peacekeepers were killed by the militia. I believe the reason for withdrawal was because of the Statess vote for inaction in the Security Council. They suffered a drop in military morale when scenes of their troops being killed in Somalia were televised. Apparently, Amer! ica did insufficiency history to retell itself in Rwanda. Finally, I do not agree that the reason for inaction was due to racial reasons. As stated above, If you want to get a lavish essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay